Hiperedição do livro Canções de meu caminho de Eulálio Motta

Abstract

This thesis, entitled Hyperedition of the book Canções de meu path by Eulálio Motta, deals with the edition and study of the book Canções de meu path, which is part of the collection of the Bahian writer Eulálio de Miranda Motta, made available on the internet through the domain https:// cancoesdemeucaminho.com.br/. The work under analysis presents two published editions and an editorial project for the third edition. The first edition was published in 1948, the second, probably, in 1983 and the third edition would come to light around 1986. From the documentation of Eulálio Motta's collection, it was found that the writer gave titles and created indexes for projects of books that were not published. Among the editorial projects, the notebook Songs of my path 3rd edition stands out, which features an index, rewritten texts accompanied by erasures, and annotations. In addition to the notebook, there are manuscripts, typescripts and printouts of unpublished poems with indications that they would be part of the third edition. These signs point to Eulálio Motta's editorial intention in publishing the third edition. Songs of my path connects with several documentary sources from the writer's collection. The work is related to a set of texts of different nature that elucidate and contextualize the poems. Given the characteristics of the corpus, its particularities, its extension and all its complexity, we thought of a dynamic and interactive editorial model that enhances the relational aspect between different types of texts and values textual layers, taking into account linguistic codes, bibliographic and contextual. Thus, the route chosen was the elaboration of a hyper-edition of 86 poems that make up the three editions of the book, through editorial layers (fac-similar, linearized transcription, updated transcription with links and synoptic comparison). Regarding the theoretical and methodological framework, the research was based on the documentary sources preserved in the collection and on studies previously developed by the researchers of the research projects themselves; in the studies of Sociology of Text, Philology and Digital Humanities. The editorial project outlined by the author is discussed here and the study is supported by interdisciplinary reflections that permeate the fields of Textual Criticism and Genetic Criticism; Memory and Collections of Writers and Philological Criticism.